Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA That's a tough question for a woman. I'll bet every guy will say 7'. But a 7' woman? Still, I guess I'd have to say 7'. Either way, clothes would be impossible to find. But at 7' no one would mess with you and you couldn't get lost in a crowd. Judy, 62
Easton, KS USA 7 foot tall Melodi, 19
Gahanna, OH USA Probably seven feet. I would hate being so short. Jeremy, 14
Highlands Ranch, CO USA There's no doubt about it. God exsits, simple as that. Maureen, 19
WA USA I'd rather be 7 foot tall. I'm overweight at 5'3" but if you stretched that weight into 7', it would be a normal weight, whereas if you compressed into 4', I'd be a little round ball of blubber. But seriously. Both have their disadvantages but I think I'd rather be tall. I've never seen a fat tall person, have you? Reba, 50+
Silver Spring, MD USA 7, but only if I had my own tailor who worked for free. It's hard enough finding pants at 5'10"! Firelady, 24
Frisco, TX USA Definitely 7 feet tall: Being tall is so much more useful than being short. Eric, 20
Beverly Hills, CA USA Well im used to being short, so 4 feet tall i suppose. either would be annoying, tho. Talia, 25
Stamford, CT USA As a guy, I'd much rather be 7 feet tall than 4. It'd suck to be so gangly, but I know that no attractive girl (and few unattractive girls) would ever, EVER date a dude four feet tall. Unless of course she was 3'9". Luckily I stand six feet tall and date freely. Poor short dudes.... A-Dog, 19
McMinnville, OR USA Neither. This is a case where I would rather be in the middle of the bell curve. Life is much simpler when you are of average size. Jane, 62
West Linn, OR USA 7 foot tall Brad, 21
Sydney AUSTRALIA Four feet tall, I guess. What a choice! I think most things in this world are built for convenience of "height-challenged" persons. Seems it would be easier to make my way around. Fisch, 47
Preston, CT USA Being 6 feet tall and a woman, I'd rather be taller than shorter. Janet, 44
E. Brunswick, NJ USA While neither option is desireable. I'd rather be 4' tall. Less stress on the body's bones and less hassle in daily life. Felicia, 36
Lowell, MA USA I'd rather be 4 feet tall and comfortable in standard furniture. Jill, 61
Saylorsburg, PA USA I'd rather be shorter. Laura, 37
Lowell, MA USA I'd much rather be 4 ft. tall. As a woman, 7 ft. is just too unusual. There are lots of short women out there...in fact, my mother is only 4' 9 or so, and she's a lovely woman! Tam I think 7 foot tall. There are more opportunities, as sad as it is, for taller people. Maybe I could be a basketball player! Tracy, 24
Ocean City, NJ USA 7, I'm less than a foot away from it now so there'd be fewer adjustments to make. Alias Irrelevante I'd definitely rather be 7 foot tall. I'm actually pretty decent at basketball and with that kind of height, I'd be a millionaire! Doug2, 29
Overland Park, KS USA 7 Feet Tall Kevin, 33
Sugar Hill, GA USA Neither. 5'4" works pretty well for me. Karen, 22
Ames, IA USA I would rather be 7. I'd have to shop in the little kids department for clothes and I would have to rely too much on other people because I could reach most things, reach the peddles in the car, etc. Stephanie, 25
TX USA Even though it might be harder for me to get a date, I'm sick of not being able to reach the pedals in my dad's truck. Cancer, 20
NYC, NY USA 4 feet. Being 7 feet tall is more freakish than being 4 feet tall. Johanna, 18
OK USA I would rather be 7 foot tall. I am just about 6 foot tall and have reached that height by the time I was 12. So all the jokes about Jolly Green Janet, or Big Bird wouldn't bother me at all. I've been through it already. I enjoy being tall, you can see at concerts, people respect you more when you are tall, I can reach the produce at the back of the display. Now that clothing in tall sizes is readily available, it good to be tall. Janet, 44
E. Brunswick, NJ USA 7 foot tall would be my choice. You could see over the croud at concerts and sporting events. Ryan, 29
Morton, IL USA 7 feet tall. Keri-Jade, 21
Brampton, Ontario CANADA